Guide to workplace and sexual harassment: the legal definitions, the duty to prevent, the internal complaints procedure, the applicable sanctions and the role of the internal rules.
Translated from Romanian. This article covers Romanian labour and tax law; the Romanian version is canonical and is updated first.
Harassment at work is no longer a matter of “atmosphere” or management style: it has legal definitions, prevention duties on the employer and sanctions. And a company’s passivity in the face of a complaint is itself a legal problem. Here is the framework.
Workplace moral harassment (hărțuirea morală la locul de muncă) is defined by the legislation on preventing and combating discrimination as any conduct engaged in with regard to an employee by another employee who is their hierarchical superior, by a subordinate or by a hierarchically comparable employee, having as its purpose or effect a deterioration of working conditions, through prejudicing rights or dignity, harming physical or mental health or compromising professional prospects.
The key element: the conduct must be repeated and must produce that effect. An isolated conflict or a justified negative appraisal does not, in itself, constitute harassment.
Sexual harassment concerns conduct of a sexual nature — verbal, non-verbal or physical — having as its purpose or effect the prejudicing of a person’s dignity and the creation of an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. Here repetition is not required — a single act may be sufficient.
The distinction matters so that normal management is not blocked:
The line is crossed when the conduct becomes repeated, personalised and has the effect of degrading working conditions or dignity.
The legislation imposes an active role on the employer, not merely refraining from such acts:
The last point is essential: if a complaint is ignored, liability extends to the employer, who has failed to meet the obligation to ensure a safe working environment.
A functioning mechanism provides for:
Where the facts are confirmed and amount to disciplinary misconduct, the prior disciplinary investigation (cercetarea disciplinară prealabilă) is triggered — with all the attendant procedural safeguards.
On two levels:
Separately, the victim may claim damages in court, and the employer may be held liable for failing to meet the duty of prevention.
One element employers underestimate: in discrimination and harassment litigation, the burden of proof is partly reversed. The person who considers themselves discriminated against presents facts from which the existence of discrimination may be presumed, and it is then for the employer to prove that no breach occurred.
In practice: internal documentation — the rules, evidence of training, the record of complaints and of the measures taken — becomes the company’s principal defence.
What distinguishes moral harassment from an ordinary conflict? Its repeated character and its effect: deterioration of working conditions, prejudice to dignity or harm to health. An isolated conflict or a justified critical appraisal is not harassment.
Do I need a written procedure? Yes. The internal rules must contain provisions on respect for dignity, the prohibition of harassment and the procedure for handling complaints.
What do I do if I receive a complaint? You investigate it promptly and impartially, in confidence, hearing both parties. Ignoring the complaint engages the company’s liability.
Can I be sanctioned if I did nothing personally? Yes. The employer is liable for failing to meet the duty to prevent and to deal with such conduct, even where the act was committed by an employee.
Who has to prove it? The person who considers themselves harmed presents facts from which discrimination is presumed; it is then for the employer to prove that no breach occurred.
See also the internal rules of procedure and the disciplinary investigation.
In a harassment case, what protects you is the documentation that existed before the complaint. Workly holds the internal rules distributed digitally, with proof of acknowledgement by each employee (confirmation and timestamp) — evidence that the rules and the complaints procedure were known.
Internal complaints can be handled through the helpdesk module, with a full history: who complained, when, what measures were taken and within what deadline — with restricted access, because this is sensitive data. And the documents of any subsequent disciplinary procedure stay in the employee’s file, numbered and dated, so that the legal deadlines can be proven.
Informational article, accurate at the date of publication. Not legal advice. Discrimination and harassment legislation is complex and individual cases require case-by-case assessment — consult a specialist when you receive a complaint.
Guide to employee monitoring: the conditions set by the Labour Code and GDPR, the proportionality test, prior notice, video cameras, work email and geolocation.
Guide to the nota de lichidare: why the Codul muncii does not require it yet it stays necessary in practice, the duty for gestionari (Legea 22/1969), content and a template.
Addendum guide: which contract changes require one, the duty to sign it before the change takes effect, REGES reporting and how it differs from an annex.
We'll show you how time tracking, payroll and the rest of the modules work for your company, in a short demo.
Request a demo